Development of Authentic Assessment Based on Digital Portfolios in STEM Education
Universitas Indonesia
Editorial & Peer-Review Lifecycle
Official transparency tracking for conference submissions.
Initial manuscript (either abstract-only or full text) has been successfully submitted to the conference/journal system.
The abstract is approved for topic relevance and scope. The author is authorized to proceed with preparing and submitting the full paper within the specified deadline.
The submitted manuscript/full paper is undergoing substantive peer review evaluation by designated reviewers.
The manuscript requires revisions based on peer-reviewer comments and recommendations before a final editorial decision is made.
Final manuscript accepted for publication (Accepted) or undergoing typesetting (In Production) prior to official publication.
The submitted manuscript/full paper is undergoing substantive peer review evaluation by designated reviewers.
Abstract
Authentic assessment plays a pivotal role in measuring higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) within the STEM education framework. This research develops a digital portfolio assessment instrument based on analytic rubrics. Construct validity testing by panel experts yielded an Aiken V coefficient of 0.89, indicating very high validity and reliability. Field testing across 45 students revealed that digital portfolio assessment effectively stimulates self-reflection and collaborative problem solving.
Keywords:
How to Cite (APA 7th Edition)
APA 7th EditionCopyright: © 2026 The Authors. Published by ICE Press.
This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Full Manuscript File
Full Text Scheduled
Publication Metadata
- Issue
- Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
- Conference Tracks & Scope
- Science Education
- Date Received
- 11 Sep 2026
- Date Published
- 11 Sep 2026
- Workflow Stage
- Under Review